Why Everyone Wants to Tear Down These 7 Famous Buildings and What They Did Wrong? Ugliest buildings ever built
- Dennis Asis
- Aug 27
- 4 min read
When it comes to architecture, everyone's view on beauty is different. Some buildings have become widely disliked, often for reasons like unattractive designs and troubled histories. This post explores seven of the most criticized buildings worldwide and explains why many believe they should be torn down.
1. The Boston City Hall, USA
Boston City Hall is frequently labeled as one of the ugliest buildings in America. Finished in 1968, its brutalist design features a cold concrete facade, which many perceive as unwelcoming. Critics urge that it lacks the warmth evident in Boston’s historic architecture, such as the charming Colonial homes and stately brick buildings surrounding it.
Residents argue that the building detracts from the beauty of the city, contributing to a sense of alienation. Some suggested that simple renovations or even a complete demolition could pave the way for a structure that aligns more closely with Boston’s character.
2. The Ryugyong Hotel, North Korea
Often dubbed the "Hotel of Doom," the Ryugyong Hotel in Pyongyang has been under construction since 1987. With its unfinished pyramid shape, it has attracted mockery and distaste. Originally meant to symbolize North Korea’s progress, it now represents failure and wasted resources amidst the nation's struggles.
The cost of the project, which has exceeded billions of dollars, is alarming considering the widespread poverty in North Korea. Many locals believe that tearing it down could better reflect the current state of the nation, rather than leaving a monument to unrealistic ambitions.
3. The Torre Velasca, Italy
Situated in Milan, Torre Velasca is a skyscraper that generates passionate discussions. Completed in 1958, its peculiar design, resembling a giant mushroom or hat, divides opinions. While some admire its audacity, others view it as an eyesore that disrupts the elegant skyline filled with Gothic and Renaissance architecture.
A notable survey indicates that about 60% of Milanese residents think the Torre Velasca should be replaced with designs that better honor the city's rich architectural history. This ongoing debate illustrates the clash between modern structures and traditional aesthetics.
4. The National Library of Kosovo, Kosovo
The National Library of Kosovo is often called a “concrete monstrosity.” Finished in 1982, its strange collection of domes and sharp angles leads many to question its functionality and beauty. Locals have openly criticized it for failing to represent Kosovo's cultural heritage.
Many feel that a more modern, traditional design would create a space that encourages learning and community engagement, rather than fostering disdain. Discussions surrounding the library highlight deeper issues of national identity and architectural integrity.
5. The Pruitt-Igoe Housing Project, USA
The Pruitt-Igoe Housing Project in St. Louis was once seen as a solution to urban housing challenges. However, after its completion in the 1950s, it quickly fell into neglect, leading to high crime rates and poverty. By the 1970s, the complex was declared uninhabitable and ultimately demolished.
Statistics reveal that after its opening, the building saw a drastic increase in crime; for example, reports showed a 30% increase in incidents within just a few years. The story of Pruitt-Igoe serves as a sharp reminder of the risks involved in modernist architecture and urban planning failures.
6. The Vdara Hotel, USA
The Vdara Hotel in Las Vegas is infamous for its design, which has unintentionally led to a “death ray” effect. The hotel’s curved glass facade reflects sunlight in a way that creates extreme heat, resulting in uncomfortable conditions for nearby guests and even causing cases of burns.
Despite its luxury accommodations, the hotel’s design flaws have prompted discussions about modifications or possible demolition. Many argue that the visual appeal of the building is outweighed by its practical disadvantages, which affect customer safety and satisfaction.
7. The Geisel Library, USA
Located in La Jolla, California, the Geisel Library features a futuristic design that some liken to a spaceship. While it is striking, many believe it clashes with the natural beauty of the landscape. Completed in 1970, it has faced criticism for accessibility issues and lack of functionality.
Advocates for redesign suggest that enhancing its practical use as a library while maintaining its unique aesthetic may better serve the community's needs. This ongoing dialogue highlights the tension between innovative design and usability in architecture.
Architectural Reflections: A Community Conversation. Ugliest buildings ever built
Not every building strikes a positive chord with the public. The seven structures discussed have faced significant backlash for a variety of reasons, spanning from their looks to their functionality.
As communities continue to grow and evolve, debates over which buildings should remain standing will persist. Whether it’s about aesthetics or practicality, the push to tear down these infamous structures symbolizes broader struggles about architecture's role in our everyday lives. Ugliest buildings ever built
Ultimately, the fate of these buildings rests with the communities they inhabit. Moving forward, it’s crucial to find a balance between visual appeal and functional practicality in our shared spaces.
Head over to our Resource Section for more insights and useful references.
Comments