Pre-colonial Architecture in the Philippines. Part 2
- Dennis Asis

- Sep 1
- 2 min read
The foundation of Filipino architecture in its primeval, nature-based forms. The cave as a "refuge" and a "place of dwelling" is the archetypal starting point for all architecture, a direct engagement with the natural landscape for shelter and protection.
The petroglyphs in the rock shelter in Angono, Rizal
Are evidence of the earliest human impulse to modify and imbue a natural space with meaning, a foundational act of turning a site into a place.

Lean-to and the treehouse
This impulse is further developed in the construction of the lean-to and the treehouse, which represent the first steps toward a distinctly "Filipino" vernacular architecture.
These structures, fashioned from wood, bamboo, and thatch, demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of local materials and climate, a hallmark of indigenous building traditions worldwide.

The concept of the "archetypal house"
A raised wooden structure on posts with a pitched roof—is central to the Austronesian building heritage that connects the Philippines to a wider Southeast Asian cultural sphere.

The stilt houses of the Badjao and the intricately carved torogan of the Maranao are not just variations on a theme; they are highly evolved architectural systems that respond to specific cultural and environmental needs.

The torogan, with its decorative gable finials and sturdy log posts resting on rounded stones, is a masterpiece of vernacular design, embodying the social status of its inhabitants and demonstrating a deep understanding of structural principles. Pre-colonial Architecture in the Philippines

This is a powerful reminder that "vernacular" is not synonymous with "primitive." Rather, it represents a body of knowledge passed down through generations, a history of architecture written not in textbooks, but in the timber and thatch of the structures themselves.

Conclusion Pre-colonial Architecture in the Philippines
Pre-Colonial Architecture in the Philippines serves as a powerful reminder that the history of architecture is not a linear progression of styles, but a dynamic and often contested process of cultural exchange, adaptation, and the ongoing quest for a built form that can truly be called its own.





Comments